Home
  Search Archives     
  Available Archives
   1969-1979
   1980-1989
   1990-1999
   2000-2009
   2010-2017
    1969    
    1969    
1970
1970
1970
1971
1971
1971
1972
1972
1972
1973
1973
1973
1974
1974
1974
1975
1975
1975
1976
1976
1976
1977
1977
1977
1978
1978
1978
1979
1979
1979
    1980    
    1980    
1981
1981
1981
1982
1982
1982
1983
1983
1983
1984
1984
1984
1985
1985
1985
1986
1986
1986
1987
1987
1987
1988
1988
1988
1989
1989
1989
    1990    
    1990    
1991
1991
1991
1992
1992
1992
1993
1993
1993
1994
1994
1994
1995
1995
1995
1996
1996
1996
1997
1997
1997
1998
1998
1998
1999
1999
1999
    2000    
    2000    
2001
2001
2001
2002
2002
2002
2003
2003
2003
2004
2004
2004
2005
2005
2005
2006
2006
2006
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
2008
2009
2009
2009
    2010    
    2010    
2011
2011
2011
2012
2012
2012
2013
2013
2013
2014
2014
2014
2015
2015
2015
2016
2016
2016
2017
2017
2017

 
   1993 >> January >> Macs Believe It Or Not  

MAC's Believe It Or Not!
by John McDougald

Reprinted from "Crown Jewels of the Wire", January 1993, page 12

As you either have or will read elsewhere in this issue, the London Show was great. I have my own way of measuring the success of a show, outside of all the normal measures of attendance, tables, sales, etc. I measure shows by the number of pictures I take. By that measure, London was one of the best shows I've been to in years. I don't think I got to take my head out of my light box until about 3:00 p.m. on Saturday afternoon and I was back at it again on Sunday. Following are some of the pictures I took, along with explanations as required. Almost no matter what you collect, I think you'll find something new in this bunch.

I have to start with the "new find" of the year. As announced several months ago in CJ, the first known example of a CD 139, Combination Safety with SDP, that's right, Sharp Drip Points, was put up for auction at London. Below are pictures from the front and back. Embossing is as follows:

(F-Skirt) COMBINATION/SAFETY
(R-Skirt) PAT. APPL'D FOR

It seems almost incredible that a style as rare as CD 139 (less than a dozen that I know of) has been found with and without drip points and with an embossing error (SAFTY).

For those, like me, who have never owned a Combination Safety and would like to, these three variations found to date indicate that at least at one time, there were probably enough for each of us. Keep looking. The one with drips came out of a collection of "ONE" insulator. 

Well, that ought to take care of the CD specialists. How about a piece for the power collectors? Pictured below is what would appear to be your standard CD 259 Cable.

Not so!! This one is base embossed. Not very unusual, you say? Right, but guess what it says on the base:


PATENTS APP'D FOR

I think that makes it a candidate for the first Oakman Cable. This piece came out of the collection of Sid Marques and currently belongs to Dwayne Anthony. I'm embarrassed to say that I saw Sid's collection twice before he sold it, and I never picked up that CD 259 to check the embossing. I'm reminded of my own advice: "Look at every piece. You, never know what's hiding in even the most modest collection or table of so-caned common insulators." Thanks to Dwayne for bringing the piece all the way from California so I could get a picture.

Next is the continuing saga of the CD 113, Hemingray embossings. I have two to share with you. First is one of my favorite embossing errors. A quick look at this piece and you don't necessarily discover what's wrong. Look again. It's embossed HEMINGRAY/NO 9 on a Hemingray No. 12 style. I saw one of these about 20 years ago, and I don't have another encounter recorded since.

I remember telling Charlie Angevine, Mr. Hemingray No.9, about that one, and I remember my surprise at his lack of interest in it. How was I to know he only collected the style (CD 106), not the embossing. Roger Lucas, the current owner of this piece, specializes in embossing errors. He brought this beauty for me to photograph, but also in the hopes of upgrading it. Note, there is some minor base damage. I told him I thought he was very fortunate to have one in any condition, but if he happened to find another, I knew there'd be a bunch of folks standing in line to get the "damaged" one. Roger, thanks for sharing.

Bill Meier continues his search for new Hemingrays to add to his collection. The embossing error he showed me at the Eastern Regional last year (see Mac's Believe It Or Not, November, 1992) now has a cousin. Please note the beginning of a second line of embossing with the letters "MA" visible. Doesn't it drive you crazy that both "MAY 2nd, 1893" and "MADE IN U.S.A." begin with "MA"? I can make a case for either. especially since I can see what appears to be mold rework under both lines of embossing. I'll let you be the judge of that one. Keep 'em coming, Bill.

Attention, porcelain collectors. Pictured here is the only known (I always worry when I say that, but if I end up being proven wrong, we all learn something) example of the Slusser's Patent. As you can see from the side and top views, this insulator has features and functionality similar to the Harloe claw (CD's 109.5 and 206.5). Embossed on the dome of the insulator are the words "SLUSSER INSULATOR", leaving little doubt as to its authenticity. This beauty came out of the collection of long time porcelain specialist John Hall and currently belongs to Jerry Turner. 

The editor says I have to stop this section of my London show report soon, so I'll wind up with a brief trip from the sublime to the ridiculous. A collector (who's name I didn't write down) brought in the porcelain piece pictured below. Take a look at it for a minute before reading on.


What do you think it is?

Note the embossing, "LAPP INSULATOR CO./LE ROY N.Y."

Well, we came up with toilet part and a few other suggestions before we were told it was a tee marker for a golf course. Easy to see once you've been told, right?!? Is this the first indication that Lapp was into golf, or did this porcelain item have another function before it showed up on the first tee? We always end up with more questions than answers.

Finally, we have a picture providing the definitive explanation for why the threadless jewel from the Confederacy became known as the teapot. Lest anyone think that we are intentionally perpetrating a hoax on the insulator public, this one is clearly as phony as the proverbial three dollar bill. It is a product of the imagination of Bob Harding who saw the possibilities of matching the spout from an old teapot and a 'spoutless' porcelain teapot insulator. Bob's repair work is exceptional, and he is now the proud owner of a real conversation piece. I thought you'd get a good laugh out of this creation. 

It's hard, Believe It Or Not!, as I sit here finishing up this section of my show report that I have just 13 more days to work for Ameritech. By the time you read this, I will be officially retired from the Telephone Company, where I've spent all of my working life since 1962. The reason I mention it here is that "The Editor" says I have to be a regular contributor to the magazine now that I'm going to have all of this spare time. Keep your eyes peeled. Next month will be the remainder of the London finds and the beginning of my "Tales from British Columbia -- Mac hits the Collins Line."



| Magazine Home | Search the Archives |