Home
  Search Archives     
  Available Archives
   1969-1979
   1980-1989
   1990-1999
   2000-2009
   2010-2017
    1969    
    1969    
1970
1970
1970
1971
1971
1971
1972
1972
1972
1973
1973
1973
1974
1974
1974
1975
1975
1975
1976
1976
1976
1977
1977
1977
1978
1978
1978
1979
1979
1979
    1980    
    1980    
1981
1981
1981
1982
1982
1982
1983
1983
1983
1984
1984
1984
1985
1985
1985
1986
1986
1986
1987
1987
1987
1988
1988
1988
1989
1989
1989
    1990    
    1990    
1991
1991
1991
1992
1992
1992
1993
1993
1993
1994
1994
1994
1995
1995
1995
1996
1996
1996
1997
1997
1997
1998
1998
1998
1999
1999
1999
    2000    
    2000    
2001
2001
2001
2002
2002
2002
2003
2003
2003
2004
2004
2004
2005
2005
2005
2006
2006
2006
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
2008
2009
2009
2009
    2010    
    2010    
2011
2011
2011
2012
2012
2012
2013
2013
2013
2014
2014
2014
2015
2015
2015
2016
2016
2016
2017
2017
2017

 
   1997 >> March >> Ask Woody  

Ask Woody
by N. R. Woodward

Reprinted from "Crown Jewels of the Wire", March 1997, page 35

N. R. "Woody" Woodward is the author of THE GLASS INSULATOR IN AMERICA, 1988 Report and developed the Consolidated Design Numbers identification system for glass insulators. 


QUESTION: When I was at the London (Ohio) show last fall, I picked up a CD 121 AM. TEL. & TEL. Co. toll because of its unusual, large, crude embossing. A rubbing of the embossing (actual size) is shown. It is twice the size of any other that I've seen. I would appreciate anything you can tell me about this insulator. George Toften, Middleburgh, NY

The "AM" is lower than the rest of the embossing.
There is no space between the "M" and the 'T'.
"TEL" is higher and offset from the rest of the embossing.

The center of the "A" is tipped down to the right.

The tops of the letters "A" and the "M" are rounded.

The color is dark aqua. There is heavy ghost lettering above the embossing on the skirt. The size seems to be shorter than my other CD 121 types.

WOODY: I know the AM. TEL. & TEL. Co. piece. I have it in my files: but no clue as to who made it. It is most unlikely that it was made by Brookfield or Hemingray. If one could tell exactly where it was in service on the line, it might help.



| Magazine Home | Search the Archives |