Home
  Search Archives     
  Available Archives
   1969-1979
   1980-1989
   1990-1999
   2000-2009
   2010-2017
    1969    
    1969    
1970
1970
1970
1971
1971
1971
1972
1972
1972
1973
1973
1973
1974
1974
1974
1975
1975
1975
1976
1976
1976
1977
1977
1977
1978
1978
1978
1979
1979
1979
    1980    
    1980    
1981
1981
1981
1982
1982
1982
1983
1983
1983
1984
1984
1984
1985
1985
1985
1986
1986
1986
1987
1987
1987
1988
1988
1988
1989
1989
1989
    1990    
    1990    
1991
1991
1991
1992
1992
1992
1993
1993
1993
1994
1994
1994
1995
1995
1995
1996
1996
1996
1997
1997
1997
1998
1998
1998
1999
1999
1999
    2000    
    2000    
2001
2001
2001
2002
2002
2002
2003
2003
2003
2004
2004
2004
2005
2005
2005
2006
2006
2006
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
2008
2009
2009
2009
    2010    
    2010    
2011
2011
2011
2012
2012
2012
2013
2013
2013
2014
2014
2014
2015
2015
2015
2016
2016
2016
2017
2017
2017

 
   1973 >> April >> CD133 H.G.Co. Standard 20  

CD133 H.G.Co. Standard 20

Reprinted from "INSULATORS - Crown Jewels of the Wire", April 1973, page 3

QUESTIONS ANSWERED BY N. R. WOODWARD
Author of The Glass Insulator in America

Question sent in by Bob Jensen, Vernal, Utah: Glad to see the new section on question answering by Mr. Woodward. I would like to ask this question. I have several H.G. Co. C.D. #133's, aqua, with large drips. Each has had the word STANDARD blotted out and been re-embossed with No. 20. The word is still quite plain, however. Mr. Milholland quotes both the STANDARD and the 20 at about $5.00. Should something like this increase it's trade value? I have traded a couple of these, and in both instances they moved quite fast. Would appreciate hearing from you about such embossing.

In reply to Bob Jensen: Both the H. G. Co. STANDARD and the H. G. Co. No. 20, subsequently made in the same molds, are desirable items especially if in good condition. Although at one time the "STANDARD" was a very common Item, that's a long time ago, and there are really very few left in service today. It would seem that there are far fewer of the No. 20 than of the STANDARD; and although the suggested price is the same, I would be inclined to value the No. 20 higher, whether or not the previous marking is visible in the mold. This particular feature is of interest to some collectors; and it is extremely valuable from a research standpoint, as it provides definite proof of the sequence in which various markings were used. Whether or not it should add to the price of the insulator would be, I think, a matter between buyer and seller in each case.



| Magazine Home | Search the Archives |