Home
  Search Archives     
  Available Archives
   1969-1979
   1980-1989
   1990-1999
   2000-2009
   2010-2017
    1969    
    1969    
1970
1970
1970
1971
1971
1971
1972
1972
1972
1973
1973
1973
1974
1974
1974
1975
1975
1975
1976
1976
1976
1977
1977
1977
1978
1978
1978
1979
1979
1979
    1980    
    1980    
1981
1981
1981
1982
1982
1982
1983
1983
1983
1984
1984
1984
1985
1985
1985
1986
1986
1986
1987
1987
1987
1988
1988
1988
1989
1989
1989
    1990    
    1990    
1991
1991
1991
1992
1992
1992
1993
1993
1993
1994
1994
1994
1995
1995
1995
1996
1996
1996
1997
1997
1997
1998
1998
1998
1999
1999
1999
    2000    
    2000    
2001
2001
2001
2002
2002
2002
2003
2003
2003
2004
2004
2004
2005
2005
2005
2006
2006
2006
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
2008
2009
2009
2009
    2010    
    2010    
2011
2011
2011
2012
2012
2012
2013
2013
2013
2014
2014
2014
2015
2015
2015
2016
2016
2016
2017
2017
2017

 
   1981 >> April >> Me And The 143  

Me And The 143 (#10)
by Grant Salzman, NIA #1785

Reprinted from "INSULATORS - Crown Jewels of the Wire", April 1981, page 13

As promised in the last article, this column will finish up with the remainder of mold style #1D, by dealing with those 143's embossed with G.N.R., G.P.R. and STANDARD, plus some no-name types. 

G.N.R. and G.P.R. No one seems to know for sure what these initials stood for. It has been said that the embossings were errors, and the "G" should have been a "C". Others speculate that G.N.R. stood for Great Northern Railway, an American line that branched into British Columbia, etc. I don't really agree with many of the theories presented. The "error" idea seems weak, because someone would have had to take a good C.P.R. mold and deliberately add something. This seems unlikely to have been done in error. It also seems unlikely that an American Railway would have their name placed on Canadian Telegraph insulators. Besides, I don't think that G.N.R. "finds" have been centralized in B.C. at all. So perhaps all of this will remain a mystery for a while longer.


(Drawing is by Clay Salzman)

So far I have seen only two embossing types each on the G.N.R. and the G.P.R. Only one G.N.R. could have been a new mold. The others were reworks of molds that had once been CNR, and some probably CPR as well.

G.N.R. 

1.   

F -- G.N.R.

   

B -- Standard 

   

Aqua (The Gauchi-McDonald study also notes the existence of this variety in a pale blue and an SCA, but I have never seen one.)

2.   

F -- G.N.R. over a blot-out of a small cnr 

   

B -- Standard 

   

Aqua 

G.P.R. 

1.   

F -- G.P.R. over a blot-out of a large CNR and a small cnr

   

B -- Standard (The lettering on this variety is 1/2" tall.) 

   

Aqua, SCA, Steel Blue 

2.   

Same as above, except the lettering on this variety has been re-worked and enlarged. It is 9/16" tall, and the angled leg of the "R" is short (R). 

   

Aqua, SCA

As mentioned in an earlier article, the embossing "STANDARD" was considered to be secondary, unless it was used by itself. I feel that the term "Standard" was originally meant to indicate that there was no inner skirt, but that later editions were produced with this embossing only in order to allow them to be used on various lines. 

STANDARD 

1.   

F -- STANDARD 

   

Aqua, Lt. Aqua, Lt. Aqua with milk swirls, Gray, Lt. SCA, Medium Purple 

2.   

F -- STANDARD

   

B -- Blot-out of a small cnr 

   

Lt. Aqua, Pale SCA, Lt. Purple, Med. Purple, Royal Purple 

3.   

F -- STANDARD over a blot-out of a large CNR 

   

Aqua, Aqua with milk swirls, Pale Aqua 

4.   

F -- STANDARD 

   

B -- Blot-out of a large CNR 

   

Aqua, Deep Olive Green Blackglass 

5.   

F -- STANDARD over a blot-out of Canadian Pacific Ry Co 

   

Aqua, Lt. Aqua with milk swirls, Pale Gray-Green, Deep Olive Green Blackglass 

6.   

F -- STANDARD over a blot-out of a large CNR 

   

B -- Blot-out of a large CNR

   

Aqua 

I have never seen a mold style #1D no-name that didn't have some traces of a blot-out or re-worked mold. However, it is possible that "clean" varieties exist, because many collectors do not examine no-names carefully. I list here those types that I have seen; but if you know of other varieties, please let me know. 

No-names 

1.   

F -- Blot-out of Canadian Pacific Ry Co 

   

Aqua, Lt. Blue 

2.   

F -- Blot-out of Canadian Pacific Ry Co

   

B -- Blot-out of Standard 

   

Aqua 

3.   

F -- Blot-out of a small cnr

   

B -- Blot-out of Standard 

   

Aqua

4.   

F -- Blot-out of a large CNR

   

Aqua (Gauchi-McDonald also lists this type in ice blue and Royal Purple, but I have not seen them.)

5.   

F -- Blot-out of a large CNR

   

B -- Blot-out of a large CPR 

   

Aqua

6.   

F -- Some horizontal dashes over what appears to be a blot- out 

   

Aqua

Prices: The G.P.R. aqua is priced a trifle too high in the book, but the SCA is priced about right. The G.N.R. is erroneously listed in the book as having an MLOD, but the aqua variety should sell for the same as the aqua G.P.R. If there is an SCA variety of the G.N.R. that exists, it would be much more expensive. 

The STANDARD prices are about right in the book, with a couple of major exceptions: To a specialist the Royal Purple with the blot-out of the small cnr is much more desirable than the usual run-of-the-mill Purple STANDARD. The other gross variance is the Blackglass STANDARD. Either variety is very rare, and one sold at the Herkimer National for $350.!! Some collectors may consider this price too high, but it sure is closer to reality than the book price of $24.!! 

It is tough to estimate the value of the no-name varieties, but I would guess that they should be about double the usual aqua price. However, if the Gauchi-McDonald purple variety exists, it would be worth much more.



| Magazine Home | Search the Archives |