Home
  Search Archives     
  Available Archives
   1969-1979
   1980-1989
   1990-1999
   2000-2009
   2010-2017
    1969    
    1969    
1970
1970
1970
1971
1971
1971
1972
1972
1972
1973
1973
1973
1974
1974
1974
1975
1975
1975
1976
1976
1976
1977
1977
1977
1978
1978
1978
1979
1979
1979
    1980    
    1980    
1981
1981
1981
1982
1982
1982
1983
1983
1983
1984
1984
1984
1985
1985
1985
1986
1986
1986
1987
1987
1987
1988
1988
1988
1989
1989
1989
    1990    
    1990    
1991
1991
1991
1992
1992
1992
1993
1993
1993
1994
1994
1994
1995
1995
1995
1996
1996
1996
1997
1997
1997
1998
1998
1998
1999
1999
1999
    2000    
    2000    
2001
2001
2001
2002
2002
2002
2003
2003
2003
2004
2004
2004
2005
2005
2005
2006
2006
2006
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
2008
2009
2009
2009
    2010    
    2010    
2011
2011
2011
2012
2012
2012
2013
2013
2013
2014
2014
2014
2015
2015
2015
2016
2016
2016
2017
2017
2017

 
   1972 >> May >> Grading Insulators  

Grading Insulators
by Dick Borman

Reprinted from "INSULATORS - Crown Jewels of the Wire", May 1972, page 2

(The following article is reprinted from the February issue of APPLIED SEALS, the monthly newsletter of the Genesee Valley Bottle Collectors' Association in Rochester, N. Y. It appeared on pages 3 and 4 in the column titled "From Pole to Pole".)

How mint is mint? or near-mint, for that matter? This is the question that plagues any insulator collector when he attempts to describe merchandise for sale or trade. Since the answer to this question is primarily a matter of individual judgment and experience, this writer can do no more than state his personal feelings on the subject.

When preparing a trade list I generally use four classification! mint, very near mint, near mint, and damaged. Let's review them one at a time and attempt to clarify them.

Mint. Taken literally this is just as they left the factory. Since most insulators offered to collectors have been in use, they have been subject to the ravages of weather, wire-wear, dust, dirt, etc., and therefore may not have a factory-fresh sheen or may posses an occasional stress mark, particularly in the area of the threads. In general if an insulator shows these normal signs of wear, but is free from damage such as chips, nicks, dings, cracks or major stains, I call it mint. Mass production of insulators, particularly older ones, often caused roughness at the mold edges, small bubble breaks, or imperfectly formed drip points. Unless these factory imperfections are beyond the norm, it's mint. Anything beyond, especially in an expensive insulator, should be described as fully as possible.

Very Near Mint (VNM). An insulator listed this way should still be a very choice item yet may posses a very small wire mark, ding, nick, or crack, usually in a fairly inconspicuous place and would to all intents and purposes display mint. You will find many in this category, since linemen, the weather, and hunters of all ages were not always kind to insulators.

Near Mint (NM). Here we find the widest range of opinions, so here goes my neck out again! A near mint insulator may have such things as an inner skirt chip, a couple of dings, a fairly small chip anywhere on the insulator, some drip point damage (insulators with perfect sharp drip points are extremely difficult to find), a bruise, or even combinations of the above. As a rule a near mint insulator should be expected to display quite well, hopefully mint, from one side. A large gouge, a crack, or heavy staining do not make it near mint in my book.


Damaged. Here we can describe them in a variety of ways, but we're talking about something less than near mint. Frequently-used terms are "minor damage", "base chips", "base damage", or "cracked", but unless you have a lot of them in this shape at a wholesale price, you're generally better off describing the damage in finer detail. Unless described otherwise, even insulators in this category should be expected to display reasonably well, perhaps near mint from one side. There are some insulators we all run into that are pretty rough, and unless they're a real scarce item probably should be considered a "wipeout" or else described as being in poor condition.

A few more points worthy of consideration are as follows:

1. Since truly mint insulators, especially to the very critical eye, are hard to come by, it's tough to positively guarantee an insulator to be mint. My particular policy is to guarantee them mint or very near mint unless specified otherwise.

2. In conjunction with the point above, every sale or trade should be accompanied by a return privilege within a reasonable period of time, usually a week or ten days. Both parties should be assured of satisfaction before a deal becomes complete.

3. On a rare or high-priced insulator, I feel that anything less than mint should be described in detail--not only the extent, but the location of any damage. When investing a large amount of cash or a piece of good glass in an item, I feel obliged to give and receive the full story.

4. Before mailing a trade or sale ask yourself this question: "Would I be happy to receive this item at the price (or trade) as described?"



Sketch by Paul E. Mohrs


| Magazine Home | Search the Archives |