Since the article on H. G. Co. Petticoat
beehives appeared in Crown Jewels (Feb. '76), I have had many responses from
readers. I would like to thank all of you who wrote me. I was really surprised
to find out how many of you out there in Insulator Land are interested in these
beehives, and how many of you actually specialize in them. The letters I have
received have all been friendly and informative, mentioning your various
collections of H. G. Co. Petticoat beehives and how and where the insulators
were found.
I recently received a very interesting letter from Paul Rosenberger
of Elgin, Illinois. He and his son have been collecting for about eight years,
and for the past three years they have been specializing in H. G. Co. Petticoat
beehives. Although Paul is interested in color, he also collects skirt and crown
letters. He has made some very interesting observations an the subject, and I
thought the information might be of interest to you also.
You probably already
know that H. G. Co. Petticoat beehives sometimes come with additional embossing
in the form of a letter on the skirt or crown, or both. Paul noted that there
are (so far) fourteen letters used, seven on the front and seven on the back
(including the upside-down "L" [""]. As you can see from
the following illustration, these letters are also consecutive.
Steve Watkins of Portland, Oregon, also specializes in
these beehives, and he also collects the skirt and crown letters. He reports
that he has two skirt-embossed backward "C's" (""), and one
dome-embossed "". I'm inclined to believe that this is a genuine
mistake by the mold maker, since by adding a "" to the list, it makes
a total of fifteen letters used, eight in back and seven in front. (More on this
thought later on).
Another point is that the same colors seem to have the
same group of letters, as a rule. I have made up a chart which you will find
within this article. It will help illustrate which letters were used (according
to color), and the location of the letters. The chart is incomplete as of this
date, as I have only contacted a few collectors to have them check their
beehives against what I already had. I'd like to thank Steve and Paul for their
help in cataloging what they have for the chart. Our three collections combined
account for nearly three-hundred beehives, so that makes a fairly good basis for
the chart.
Large Image (132 Kb)
I would like to add a few words of explanation about the chart. As
you can see, I have grouped two colors together in each category. This was done
to save space, since a larger chart would not have been readable by the time it
was reduced in size for the page in the magazine. However, as you catalog your
own beehives you can list each color by itself, if you choose. That would be a
much better way of doing it, since you would then have an accurate record of
your embossings for each exact color.
As you look at the chart, several
things become obvious immediately. For instance, when there is a letter on the
front of the beehive, it can appear above or below the "H. G. Co.".
But just certain letters appear below, and certain ones appear above. On the
back of the beehive, all the letters appear below the "PETTICOAT". (So
far none have been reported above). Also, to this date only one has been found
to have both front and crown letter (""), but none appear to have
both front and back letter.
Also, it seems that every amber shade has a letter,
and so far they all appear in front. But no amber has turned up with just a
crown letter. (A very light lemon yellow has been reported with a crown
"H"). All the other colors sometimes appear with just a crown letter.
And every color except the ambers have skirt and crown letters. When this
occurs, the letter is usually on the back, and is the same as the letter on the
crown. By studying the chart, you will notice these and other details.
Paul
mentions that in the embossings, they may have skipped the letter "0"
because it might be misconstrued as a "C". This brought an idea to my
mind, and expanding on it a little, I came up with the following thoughts. Could
it be that the first fourteen letters were chosen purposely by the mold makers
because they were also the ones most distinctly different from all the other
letters in the alphabet? If you will notice in the first illustration, no letter
beyond "N" is used. Perhaps this was because any letter after
"N" could be misread in a weak embossing as one of the first fourteen
letters. For example, a "P" could look like "B", or an
"0" could be misread as a "C", a "Q" as a
"C." an "R" as a "B", and so forth. In other
words, maybe the mold makers tried to make every letter they used as different
from one another as they possibly could, in order to avoid confusion. For, if
all the letters in the alphabet had been used, confusion most certainly would
have resulted, as so many of them are similar in appearance.
But why was a
backward "N" ("") used? It could be that by using
"", it was more readily identifiable and not as easily confused with
"M". (A "" does look less like an "M" than an
"N" does). And why was the letter "F" omitted? Perhaps
because it alone, of all the other first fourteen letters of the alphabet,
looked too much like other letters ("P" and "T", for
instance). By not using any of these three letters, they could never be confused
with one another.
And now for the real puzzler -- the upside-down
"L" (""). It looks like a "T", and might be
misread as such in a poor embossing, so perhaps it is a genuine mistake, and the
mold maker just got it upside-down when he made the mold. However, by using the
"", it makes up for their not using "F". and therefore
there are exactly seven letters used in back as well as seven in front. As for
the "", I tend to believe that it is just a mistake. If it weren't a
mistake, then the number of letters used both in front and back would not be the
same.
Now, all of this information on why certain letters were used is pure
speculation on my part, and consists entirely of uneducated guesses. It would be
very interesting to talk with a mold maker to find out the real reasons why they
chose the letters they did, and why they left out certain ones. Maybe some of
you have information or knowledge along this line that you can share with us.
We'd like to hear from you.
In conclusion, please write to me at 3269 N. Mt.
View Drive, San Diego, CA 92116, if you can add any information to the chart
shown in this article, or on the making of mold letters. I know the chart is
incomplete, and I am counting on you to help fill in the blanks. Also, I am
anxious to hear if any of you have an "F". or a true "N". So
far none have been reported. So please check your beehives, make a list of your
letter embossings, their locations, and insulator colors, and let's hear from
you.
Incidentally, I have blank copies of the chart which I will gladly send on
request. It may make it easier for you to catalog your embossings. I'll send you
two copies, one for your own use and one to send back to me, and I'll return
your postage if you send me a copy of what you have. I'll compile all the
information I receive and publish the results in Crown Jewels in a few months.
Thanx in advance for your help!