A Lighter Tone of Carnival - The Obscure TS-2 & TS 3
by Colleen & Ken Crawford
Reprinted from "INSULATORS - Crown Jewels of the Wire", September 1981, page 10
We had the fortunate luck one day to discover three very unusual
insulators near our home, two CD 142.4
3 and a CD 142 TS-2 (with just that
embossing, TS-2). They were together on abandoned lines along the local
railroad, and easily accessible. That day we even skipped by (amber) LOWEX-512
cable insulators and shiny carnival PYREX 63's just to get these odd finds.
Not
being too familiar with the
3 (backward S on both), and not aware of its
rarity, we figured they were worth as much as the listed CD 142
"HEMINGRAY-W.U.T. CO./TS-2". Checking up in the '76 & '77 price
lists, we found them to be worth above $300.00, and our TS-2 unlisted and
'unknown' (Is it?).
We wrote to Mr. N. R. Woodward, our friend, inquiring about
our finds. Besides the information given on the TS-2 in his 1973 REPORT, he sent
us copies of technical data from the early files of the Western Union Telegraph
Company, consisting of specifications and installation of TS-2 insulators in
1935 as an "attempted perfect insulator" experiment. We would like to
share with any carnival glass collectors or collectors of "HEMINGRAY",
and all readers, some facts taken from these spec. sheets on the TS-2 as far as
purpose, treatment, installation, etc. Information as far as the TS 3 could only
be assumed, since there is no reference to it on the sheets.
The TS-2 and TS 3
were experimental telegraph insulators developed by the Engineering Department
of Western Union to be used as a test, and not for standard telegraph work. They
were made by OWENS-ILLINOIS (l935). Both were designed as low-leakage
insulators. The TS-2's copper bushing and the TS 3's glass insert were used for
this purpose. We wonder if "TS" in this case could possibly mean
"TREATED SURFACE", since they are telegraph insulators, unlike the
telephone type, CD 129. The TS- 2, or "treated single-petticoat side
groove" (as it's referred to on the sheets), was designed with special
attention to protecting the inner surface against dirt and keeping the insulator
electrically resistant. The carnival treatment was supposed to stop static and
electric noise. At one time Corning Glass Works tried to sue Western Union
because they held the patent on the carnival treatment, but there were
differences in the intention of its use. Corning's was for visual effect, or as
marker-insulator coloring; and Western Union's was for electrical reasons.
According to the specifications for the TS-2, Western Union clearly made a point
of placing the manufacturer's name, a mold number, date code, and W.U.T.
CO./TS-2 on these insulators. Ours has no such lettering, only TS-2. This could
be a sample type insulator, or the earliest embossing used.
The light carnival
coloring was supposed to be sprayed on the interior and exterior petticoat. Ours
has carnival only inside the interior an skirt and around the edge of the upper
wire ridge. (Are other TS-2's like this one, or do they all have outside skirt
color?!) Possibly several thousand TS-2 insulators were made for testing.
Production was limited due to failure in actual use of TS-2's on telegraph
lines.
Our assumption is that when moisture came in contact with the copper
bushing, this remained there and eventually reacted to form copper-oxide
residues. This made the bushing greenish-black, and the insulator electrically
unstable or highly conductive. Here are some interesting facts from the data:\
The grade of glass had to be free from defects and impurities while
being, if not colorless, only slightly green tinted. The copper bushing and
iridizing solution (carnival) were supplied by the engineering department of
Western Union, not OWENS-ILLINOIS (HEMINGRAY). One gallon of iridizing solution
could treat 700 insulators. After iridizing, the insulators were carefully
placed into an annealing lehr. The manufacturer (0.-I.) had to supply all
iridizing equipment. All had to be washed and tested after annealing. The test
was to see if water would form a large drop at the inside of the shoulder after
running all through the path of the inner threads. Insulators were rejected for
usage if water ran across the inside threads or refused to shake loose from the
insulator. This would be an indication of incomplete washing or iridizing.
Insulators were rejected if they had air bubbles, blow holes, off-center
threads, "fins", checks, cracks, rough edges, or blotchy carnival
treatments. (The TS-2 we have has the whole top lop-sided.)
The date of the
"inventing" of the TS-2 was JULY 23, 1935, specifications arranged on
SEPT. 6, 1935, and provisional specifications (installation specs.) set forth
MARCH 16, 1935. As to the installation of TS-2's on lines owned by Western
Union, the procedure was very important and carefully planned. Insulators were
not to be used if they fell in mud, dirt, water, etc. Wooden pins should be
complete and not split, having the least amount of build-up, or it was to be
replaced. No contaminant should be inside the bushing, or the leakage path would
short out. Inserts (bushings) had to be kept if cracked insulators were
discarded. By the way, in this data the insulating pin was called a COB and
STANDARD INSULATOR GAUGE, developed DECEMBER 21, 1914.
As to the experimental TS
3 - there is really no information, except that little more than 100 were made,
and they are usually found together near TS-2 insulators. Their iridized glass
insert was made with expert precision; there are very fine-machined lines around
it. Our
3's have two different appearances -- one is a "rusty" medium
carnival, while the other is an irridescent light yellowish-gold carnival. It
has an "olive oil" appearance.
Both inserts have a rough inside edge
where the glue was supposedly applied. The glue should have been placed where it
comes in contact with the insulator, and not at the dead air space inside the
insert where it was useless. The inserts were found resting on the crossarm
separate from the insulators. There was some exhaust film inside the insulator
only on the area where exposure could reach, below the insert. This would mean
the insert could've been connected properly for all that time in use, and
recently loosened away from the insulator. The
3's we have are chipped in the
same place, on the upper wire ridge, which is an obvious stress point.
In the
picture the TS-2 is in the middle of the two
3's.
If anyone else has a CD 142
TS-2 with just this embossing, or a TS 3 they found, let us know.
Mr. & Mrs.
Ken Crawford
14 Shepard Terrace
West Rutherford, NJ 07073
|